Skip to Content
Call Us Today! 904-590-2689
Top

Eleventh Circuit Gives Hope to Detainees Subject to Prolonged Mandatory Detention

|

In Sopo v. Attorney General, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the mandatory detention statute at U.S.C. § 1226(c), “authorizes detention for a reasonable amount of time. When this reasonable period is exceeded, the government must provide a bond hearing to determine whether the person’s continued detention is permissible. Such continued detention would only be appropriate where there was a finding that the person was a flight risk, or posed a danger to the community.

The Court did not adopt a bright-line rule regarding a specific period of time at which detention without a bond hearing would be considered unreasonably prolonged, but instead called for a case-by-case analysis to determine when the necessity for a bond hearing is triggered. Relevant factors include: the length of detention, the causes for any delay in proceedings, the likely duration of future detention, the likelihood that proceedings will culminate in a final order of removal, the foreseeability of removal if ordered removed, the length of the person’s criminal sentence when compared to the time spent in immigration detention, and the conditions of confinement while in immigration detention.

The Court was clear that the filing of a habeas petition, how prolonged detention has previously been challenged in the Eleventh Circuit, is not required and a person subject to prolonged mandatory detention should be able to request release on bond directly from an Immigration Judge. The Court noted, “[t]he government is constitutionally obligated to follow the law, and the law under § 1226(c) now includes a [implicit] temporal limitation against the unreasonably prolonged detention of a criminal alien without a bond hearing.” This is a welcome change, especially for detainees who must proceed without the benefit of counsel, given how difficult it is for an unrepresented detainee to effectively challenge their continued detention in Federal Court.

The full decision is available here: http://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/201411421.pdf

A link to reports by Detention Watch Network regarding the conditions in certain immigration detention centers is available here: http://www.detentionwatchnetwork.org/pressroom/reports/2012/expose-and-close

Karen Winston regularly defends persons detained at immigration detention facilities throughout Florida and the U.S. If your loved one is detained and you have questions about their rights and potential defenses to deportation, contact our office today to schedule a consultation.

The post Eleventh Circuit Gives Hope to Detainees Subject to Prolonged Mandatory Detention appeared first on Immigration Law Office of Karen Winston.

Contact Us Today

Schedule A Consultation

We can help you in English, Spanish, or Haitian Creole. Get started today!

  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.
  • By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your request & other information using automated technology. Message frequency varies. Msg & data rates may apply. Text STOP to cancel. Acceptable Use Policy
  • High Success Rate

    Over almost 15 years of service, Karen Winston has an impressive record of keeping families together.

  • Reputation for Excellence

    As an attorney and former law professor, Karen Winston is well-respected before USCIS, courts, and judges.

  • Immigration Is All We Do

    We focus exclusively on Immigration services and are fully prepared for whatever your case may need.

  • Trustworthy Representation

    Our dedicated team truly cares about each client, and we hold ourselves to the highest ethical standards.